Sunday, March 31, 2013

Noa Shaindlinger, graduate student and psychopath



Let me introduce you to Noa Shaindlinger, PhD student at the University of Toronto and psychopath. Earlier this month in a tragic training exercise, two Israeli reserve soldiers lost their lives in a helicopter accident.  Shaindlinger tweeted that this was “good news.”



In another tweet, Shaindlinger refers to a soldier injured in a different accident and says, “A shame he didn’t die.”



In another, Shaindlinger directs her followers to a “feel good” video of a Palestinian hurling a Molotov cocktail at an Israeli soldier.

Let me repeat that: Watching someone being hit by a gasoline bomb makes her “feel good.”

Perhaps psychopath is too kind a word. After all, psychopaths can’t help themselves, and Shaindlinger chooses to be a terrorist groupie. She identifies herself with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which Canada, The European Union, Japan, the United States and Israel all designate as a banned terrorist organization.

For very good reason.

Back in the 1970s, the PFLP pioneered the hijacking of passenger jets and has continued acts of terrorism ever since. Nor has is it confined its aggression to hapless tourists aboard hijacked airlines. The PFLP ignited the Black September conflict between Palestinians and Jordan, in which thousands of Palestinians were killed, and also took part in the Lebanese Civil War, in which thousands more were killed.

These days the PFLP is part of the rejectionist front – Palestinian groups who reject the notion of peace with Israel and forthrightly declare that their mission is to wipe Israel off the map.

Shaindlinger is currently pursuing her politics courtesy of our tax dollars. Her bio at U of T’s Centre for Diaspora and Transnational Studies identifies Shaindlinger’s area of interest as “(neo)coloniality in the Middle East and North Africa.” That is, for her PhD, she is busily inventing a tale of Israel as an evil colonial power, so evil that when an Israeli is hit by a flaming bottle of gasoline, we should “feel good.”  
  

Saturday, March 30, 2013

The Toronto District School Board has 1,545 people on staff making more than $100,000


If you’ve ever worried that teachers might not make enough money – as was certainly true in the bad old days – worry no more. The average teacher’s salary is $84,000 a year, plus great benefits. And 201 teachers working for the Toronto Board make more than $100,000, including 83 curriculum leaders or assistants  and 76 ordinary secondary school teachers, who make up to $173,000. For this teachers work nine months a year, with no requirement to lead any extracurricular activities.  

Here’s the breakdown from the Sunshine List:

6  plumbers working for the TDSB made more than $100,000 (which all by itself explains why we can’t afford to keep our schools in good working order)

17 Central Coordinating Principals $120,740.23 to $139,581.70

19 Superintendents of Education $151,424.07 - $173,213.71

83 Curriculum Leaders Secondary or Assistant Curriculum Leaders Secondary $100,013.12 - $159,312.04

261 Principal or Vice Principal Secondary $100,606.15 - $160,068.19 - A VP Secondary tops the salary list in this category

567 Principals, Elementary $100,344.30 - $154,880.40

76 Teachers, Secondary $100,000 - $173,000

42 Teachers, Elementary $100,071.19 - $155,666.92

And of course Chris Spence, former director of education - $270,000 and $19,000 in benefits. After resigning for serial plagiarism, Spence was given a $200,000 golden parachute. The new acting director of education also gets a salary similar to Spence's, in the $200,000-plus range. Let's hope she earns it.

Sunday, March 24, 2013

The official newspaper of the Palestinian Authority praises Hitler, says the Americans, Freemasons, and Jews were behind 9-11 attacks

Composed by the Russian secret police
about 1890, the Protocols of the
 Learned Elders of Zion is a basic text
of Jewish conspiracy theories

Absent from all the reporting about Obama’s recent trip to the Middle East was any sort of realistic reporting on Palestinian attitudes toward Americans and Jews. Why? Probably because if you look at what’s actually in their own media, Palestinians come across as totally crazy.

Two days before Obama’s visit to Israel and the West Bank, Al-Hayat Al-Jadida printed an editorial praising Hitler and Nazism, condemning Roosevelt and Churchill, and accusing the Americans of being behind the 9-11 terrorist attacks.

Al-Hayat Al-Jadida you must understand is the official mouthpiece of the Palestinian Authority; it’s not a extremist paper (not by Palestinian standards) it’s the “moderate” voice of mainstream Palestinian politics.

Unfortunately it’s a voice full of hate and paranoia that understands world events as being manipulated by a conspiracy of Jews/Zionists and their partners the Freemasons... 


Op-ed by Hassan Ouda Abu Zaher:

The Mufti of Jerusalem, the leading Palestinian political figure,
spent WWII as a guest of Hitler, broadcasting Nazi 
propaganda to Palestine and the wider Middle East
'History is a great lie written by the victors' - said Napoleon Bonaparte, the source of dubious historical writing and father of Freemasonry in France. If so, is the history planted in us through TV and the standard educational curriculum indeed true? The source of this history is the West – the victor ever since the fall of Andalusia (Muslim Spain)! ...
Our history is replete with lies … [including] the lie about Al-Qaeda and the Sept. 11 events, which asserted that Muslim terrorists committed it, and that it was not an internal American action by the Freemasons, which was mentioned in the Illuminati game cards ten years before it took place, and in over 15 Zionist and Freemason Hollywood-produced films in the 1990s. 
The method of repeating [the lies] over and over has authenticated false facts. Had Hitler won, Nazism would be an honor that people would be competing to belong to, and not a disgrace punishable by law.
 Churchill and Roosevelt were alcoholics, and in their youth were questioned more than once about brawls they started in bars, while Hitler hated alcohol and was not addicted to it. He used to go to sleep early and wake up early, and was very organized. These facts have been turned upside down as well, and Satan has been dressed with angels' wings..." Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, March 18, 2013

This peculiar notion of the Zionists/Jews and Freemasons secretly running the world dates back to Russia and France in the late Nineteenth Century, but doubtless came to the Palestinians and the wider Middle East via the Nazis, who were and are much admired by many Palestinians and other Arabs.

Freemasons also get a mention in the Hamas charter. This is the foundational document of the Hamas "resistance" movement, and is meant to express Hamas's most basic beliefs. Such as...

A cell of "subversion and saboteurs"
That is why you find them [the enemies of Islam] giving these attempts [to corrupt women] constant attention through information campaigns, films, and the school curriculum, using for that purpose their lackeys who are infiltrated through Zionist organizations under various names and shapes, such as Freemasons, Rotary Clubs, espionage groups and others, which are all nothing more than cells of subversion and saboteurs. These organizations have ample resources that enable them to play their role in societies for the purpose of achieving the Zionist targets….

"They were behind the French Revolution,
the Communist Revolution...
They were behind the French Revolution, the Communist revolution and most of the revolutions we heard and hear about, here and there. With their money they formed secret societies, such as Freemasons, Rotary Clubs, the Lions and others in different parts of the world for the purpose of sabotaging societies and achieving Zionist interests. 
With their money they were able to control imperialistic countries and instigate them to colonize many countries in order to enable them to exploit their resources and spread corruption there… 
The Zionist invasion is a vicious invasion. It does not refrain from resorting to all methods, using all evil and contemptible ways to achieve its end. It relies greatly in its infiltration and espionage operations on the secret organizations it gave rise to, such as the Freemasons, The Rotary and Lions clubs, and other sabotage groups.
As with many conspiracy ravings these passages make sense only to someone who’s quite mad; but their meaning is easily summarized: the Jews and their lackeys (the Rotarians, Freemasons and the Lions Club) are doing evil everywhere. 

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Memo to teachers' unions: You don't get $84,000 a year for a part time job



Politicized teachers "standing up for democracy" by targeting our kids
My sister is a teacher. She works long hours. So do most teachers. The teachers I've dealt with at my kids' elementary schools have earned my respect. They're caring and professional, intelligent, imaginative and enthusiastic. I can't praise them highly enough.

For the excellent service most teachers provide, they take home a fair salary:  $84,000 a year on average, plus great benefits – the kind of benefits most people in the private sector can only dream of.

On top of this, teachers have ten weeks off in the summer, two weeks at Christmas and another week in March – for a total working year of just nine months. In addition, their contracted working time is only 300 minutes a day. That's five hours. Put that together – nine months a year at five hours a day – and you've got a part-time job.

That's what it says on paper. But other than a few deadbeats that some schools are cursed with, teachers put in more hours every week leading extracurricular activities and hours more preparing lessons.

Except of course when they're in a snit or their unions tell them not to.

Currently most teachers in Ontario are in a snit or are conducting a work-to-rule job action as ordered by their union. The teachers are annoyed that the government imposed a contract on them. They say that's a violation of their rights. Doubtless it is. On the other hand, the government has not only a right but an obligation to the people of Ontario to keep the province from going bankrupt while keeping our schools working.

I don't know whose rights trump whose in this situation, but that's why we have a justice system. The teachers' unions have taken the government to court over the issue, and if indeed the government has overstepped their bounds, the courts will slap them down.

But in the meanwhile, the elementary teachers' school union has ordered teachers to continue taking out their anger on the kids, and while the high school teachers' union has given permission to resume extracurricular activities, in many schools they haven't  including in my daughter's high school.

This means no extra help for kids having trouble with math. No letters of recommendation for kids hoping to get into university next year. No meetings with parents. And of course no sports, school plays, after school clubs or any of the other activities that teachers normally supervise as part of their job.

In contrast, at my son's elementary school, the teachers are supposed to be continuing their work to rule campaign. Of course, that's not how the elementary school teachers' union puts it. They're not in a legal strike position, so they call this job action a political protest. A couple school boards in the province have taken the unions to court, so we may see a judge order a stop the union's campaign – or not. It's hard to guess what a judge will do.

In the meanwhile, while the teachers at my son's school are supposed to be taking part in the union's work-to-rule campaign, they're actually doing more than their high-school counterparts. Before March break, they took the kids on a three-day trip to an outdoor education centre. So the teachers were on duty for about 56 hours straight, and then returned and put in another two days of class time for the week.

They do the same every year. To repeat: putting in long hours is the sort of thing teachers normally do. But their union claims that such extra hours are voluntary and that extracurriculars aren't part of a teacher's job.

Decades ago, that may have been true. Since then, the profession has evolved. Decades ago, teaching was a low prestige job with bad wages. Not anymore. And seriously, in what other job do you get to call yourself a professional, earn $84,000 a year, and yet claim that you're really obliged only to put in only part-time hours?

I think it's a fair guess that the unions aren't asking for a return to low wages, so I'd really like to see a contract that spells out that extracurriculars are part of what teachers are getting paid $84,000 a year for. Besides putting a stop to the sort of work-to-rule nonsense the unions are currently inflicting on our kids, spelling out what's expected of all teachers will also put the deadwood on notice that they're not being paid just to show up.

Because of course there are teachers who never lead any extracurriculars, who have used the same lecture notes for decades, and who frankly just don't give a damn. Perhaps it's a pipe dream, but if we spell out what teachers are actually expected to do, maybe we can get rid of the teachers who don't do it.

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Marc Garneau, Justin Trudeau & the end of the Liberal leadership race

Justin Trudeau, "a strangely pretty 41-year-old former snowboarding instructor"
Today, Marc Garneau, the second strongest candidate in the race to lead the federal Liberals, called it quits. He conceded the obvious: he can't win.

More than that, it was obvious that Trudeau was going to take the leadership on the first ballot. The other six candidates in the race weren't even going to be able to muster 50% between them.

With Garneau out of it, there's no longer a real race at all. Barring some catastrophic accident or extreme act of self-destruction before the vote, Justin Trudeau is now the new leader of the federal Liberals.

Which leads us to Terry Glavin's excellent opinion piece published in the Ottawa Citizen about Justin Trudeau...


The Trudeau effect by Terry Glavin
Everybody’s laughing at Italy this week. Silvio Berlusconi is back. Italian voters have somehow managed to give their comically corrupt 76-year-old former prime minister a clear shot at keeping the country’s centre-left coalition from the Lower House majority it needs to properly govern the austerity-wracked country. Ha ha. Idiots.
But this sort of thing can happen to the nicest of democracies. There are rules that apply here, and Canadians should not be too quick to mock. After allowing its leadership race to degenerate into a sort of cross between a beauty contest and a reality television show, Canada’s very own Liberal Party, for instance, is on the verge of handing its crown to someone it would not be entirely wrong to call a largely talentless and insufferably foppish celebrity drama queen.
This is not a nice way to describe Justin Trudeau. It is also one thing to be Italy’s best-known patron of teenaged prostitutes and quite another thing to be merely a strangely pretty 41-year-old former snowboarding instructor who would be wholly unknown to all of us if he weren’t the son of a famously glamorous Canadian prime minister.
But at some point, it is going to have to be made to sink in. This is a guy who was boasting, as recently as 2001: “I don’t read newspapers. I don’t watch the news. I figure, if something happens, someone will tell me.” This is a guy whose main real job before he got into federal politics five years ago was a stint as a teacher at Vancouver’s West Point Grey Academy.
I note that particular gig only because earning as much as $462,000 a year for merely being the celebrity Justin Trudeau and giving inspirational speeches at up to $15,000 a pop is not what is ordinarily considered a “real” job. It is a racket, and Trudeau has carried on with it, featherbedding his $158,000 MP’s salary with more than a quarter of a million dollars’ worth of these celebrity “speakers’ fees” since 2008, when he first got elected Member of Parliament for the down-at-heels Montreal riding of Papineau.
Odd as it sounds, there is no House of Commons rule that prohibits MPs from moonlighting like this. Odder still, Trudeau has got away with justifying this lucrative sideline work on the grounds that he’s doing it as a favour to his constituents. “It is to make sure that the values of the people who elected me in Papineau are being heard in Ottawa and across the country,” he told reporters.
This is like something the notoriously stupid Alaskan ex-governor Sarah Palin might have said, but it gets a pass when Trudeau says it, and Trudeau gets away with this sort of thing all the time owing only to a pathetic and distinctly Canadian variety of celebrity-worship. This is not to be mean. It is actually the most charitable way to explain how it has come to pass that Justin Trudeau, if you don’t mind, is actually on the verge of annexing the Liberal Party of Canada as his personal vanity project.
It has got so that two weeks ago, when the leadership contender Martha Hall Findlay hinted at Trudeau’s obvious unsuitability to the task of championing the “middle class” he claims to be uniquely qualified to champion, she was jeered at and shouted at and hounded until she apologized. Maclean’s magazine called her question a “jarring outburst.”
If this were France in 1793, Justin Trudeau would be just another dandy in a powdered wig and a frilly shirt being trundled away to his just reward on the guillotine at the Place de Carrousel in Paris. But this being Canada in 2013, to merely ask out loud why it is that not once since Justin Trudeau declared his candidacy last fall has he managed to articulate a single original and coherent thought, is to be not just impolite, but inexcusably impudent and saucy beyond all bounds.
Only the other day, when the sturdy and perfectly capable leadership candidate Marc Garneau came close to publicly noticing Trudeau’s determined vacuity, Postmedia News reported that Garneau had subjected the dauphin to a “fiery attack.”
The Liberal party’s desperation — down to 35 seats in the House of Commons, rudderless, bereft of ideas — is not sufficient to explain this state of affairs. Neither is money, although Trudeau has purchased a great advantage over his competitors in the race by outspending all eight of them combined. The main reason is merely that his name is Trudeau. It’s the glitz of it. With a family name like that, it’s amazing what you can get away with.
In Montreal, Justin is one half of a high-society power couple, the other half of which is Sophie Gregoire-Trudeau, a former entertainment-television personality, a sometime bulimia-awareness ambassador and occasional New Age self-improvement evangelist of some sort. Gregoire has been known to explain the scourge of global violence against women as a matter of some dislocation in “the feminine and masculine balance of divinity.” Just last week, the 38-year-old Gregoire-Trudeau showed up in the Globe and Mail describing herself as being “at that awkward stage between jail bait and cougar.”
Can you imagine the spouse of any other politician getting away with saying something like that? Of course you can’t.
Then there’s Justin’s “senior adviser” in his leadership campaign, a celebrity documentarist whose works include a crude piece of anti-Israel propaganda produced in association with the Iranian government’s English-language propaganda arm. This most cherished of Justin’s confidantes is also famous for having penned a 2006 essay for the Toronto Star attributing such super-human powers to Cuban strongman Fidel Castro, “an expert on genetics, on automobile combustion engines, on stock markets, on everything,” as the ability to go long periods without sleep and to harvest sea urchins from the ocean floor at depths of 20 metres without any artificial breathing apparatus.
This is Justin’s brother Alexandre we’re talking about here, so, you know, back off.
These are the Trudeaus. They are, first and foremost, rich and famous. They are chic and glamorous. “They are,” as F. Scott Fitzgerald put it in his short story The Rich Boy, “different from you and me.”
The same rules just don’t apply.
Terry Glavin is an author and journalist whose most recent book is Come From the Shadows.

Friday, March 8, 2013

Palestine House in Mississauga continues its support for terrorism

Protest in Gaza in support of jailed Palestinian terrorists
TORONTO (from The Jewish Tribune) - Palestinian terrorists on intermittent hunger strikes in Israeli prisons were hailed as heroes at a sparsely attended protest Saturday in front of the Royal Ontario Museum.

The protest, which had a slow start and at its height consisted of only 40 people, was organized by Palestine House and the Apartheid Coalition in support of on-again, off-again hunger strikers Samer Issawi, Jafar Ezzedine, Tareq Qa’adan and Ayman Sharawna. 

The four reportedly decided to go hungry to raise awareness that they were being held on “administrative detention” in Israeli prisons. Two of the men have also stopped taking their vitamins.

(It's rumoured the jailed terrorists want Flintstones vitamins, but the evil Israelis will give them nothing but standard adult multi-vitamins.)

Speakers and signs at the protest referred to the four men as political prisoners; not one mentioned the terrorism for which two of the men had been convicted or the membership of the other two in a terrorist organization. One teenaged boy held up a sign describing Issawi as a “hero.”

IDF Spokesperson Captain Eytan Buchman told CAMERA (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting) that Issawi (aka Isawi) “was convicted of severe crimes, which included five attempts of intentional death.”
Protest in Toronto in support of jailed Palestinian terrorists
Issawi was serving a 26-year sentence when he was released as part of the ransom given in 2011 for the release of kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. Issawi was sentenced recently to eight months for breaching the terms of that release, according to media reports.

Sharawna (aka Sharouna) was also released in the Shalit deal before completing a 38-year prison sentence. He is “a Hamas member...arrested in 2002 for his involvement in multiple attacks.... Sharouna took part in a bombing in Beer Sheva that wounded 18 people, attempted to kidnap an IDF soldier, and was involved in shooting attacks targeting soldiers,” Arutz Sheva reported.

Sharawna was reportedly incarcerated for breaching the terms of his release.

Ezzedine and Qa’adan, members of the terrorist group Islamic Jihad, were arrested and imprisoned during Operation Pillar of Defence, according to Arutz Sheva.

Salim Mansur, vice-president, Council for Muslims Facing Tomorrow (MFT), told the Jewish Tribune, “MFT recognizes the difficulties Israeli people are faced with in protecting themselves and we support measures adopted by the Israeli government that are open to scrutiny domestically and by outside agencies. 

"The quickest way to end the violence in the region, "said Mansur, "is for Palestinians and Arabs to end their long-standing opposition to Israel, their anti-Israel and anti-Jewish bigotry, recognize Israel and the Jewish state’s historic rights in Palestine or in parts of the ancient land of Judea and Samaria, and through genuine reconciliation open a better future for Palestinian children.”

Note: Palestine House, which helped organize this protest, used to be funded by the Canadian government. In February 2012, the government cut off funding to Palestine House because of their political extremism and support for terrorism - despite protests from the NDP. See here.

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Bob Hepburn of the Toronto Star recommends Premier Wynn adopt a secret agenda


Until it came to public attention, the Toronto District School
Board, where Premier Wynne got her start as a politician,
supplied teachers with this resource on sex tips for teens,
which included advice on how to use vegetables as sex toys.
In his column in today’s Toronto Star, Bob Hepburn argues that it’s too risky for the Liberals to openly endorse a new sex education curriculum for Ontario schools. If adopted, the new curriculum will explain anal sex and blow jobs to twelve-year-olds and make sure that eight-year-olds understand homosexuality.

As a minister in Dalton McGuinty's government, Kathleen Wynne tried to introduce this new curriculum a couple years ago. A lot of people objected, arguing that kids should be allowed their innocence. With an election coming up, Dalton McGuinty decided that pushing the new curriculum through would be political suicide.

But now Kathleen Wynne is premier and she believes passionately that twelve-year-olds have to understand anal sex. In fact in her very first news conference on January 27 after winning the Liberal leadership Wynne promised to re-introduce the new sex-ed curriculum.

Problem is this new curriculum is still political suicide. Hepburn’s solution is simple: Don’t tell anyone what you plan to do till after the next election. As Hepburn says, rather than go ahead with the new sex-ed program now: “the wiser move would be to wait until after securing a fresh mandate in an election that could occur as early as this summer.

And then of course, with the Liberals having won re-election, it will be too late for the people of Ontario to have any say about what our kids will be taught in school.

Fortunately, Hepburn's just a sleazy columnist for the Toronto Star, not a politician. I trust that if Kathleen Wynne wants twelve-year-olds to be learn about blow jobs in school, she'll campaign on the issue, not sneak in her new sex-ed program after winning re-election.

Saturday, March 2, 2013

Sentenced to 100 lashes for pre-marital sex: 15-year-old girl raped by stepfather who then murdered baby

The UN's vision of Human Rights
At the end of 2012, the Maldives was elected to a vice presidency of the UN Human Rights Council. The Maldives has a peculiar conception of human rights, but of course the UN already knew that…

From the Independent:

A teenage girl in the Maldives who was repeatedly raped by her stepfather has been ordered to receive 100 lashes after she confessed to having had pre-marital sex with another man. She is said to be deeply traumatised.

In an incident that has triggered widespread condemnation, the 15-year-old from the remote Feydhoo island was this week also ordered to spend eight months under house arrest. The flogging – handed down under a system of Shariah Law – will be carried out once the teenager reaches the age of 18 though she can ask it to be brought forward if she wishes.

The Maldives receives around 700,000 international visitors every year, lured its pristine beaches and shimmering oceans. But the archipelago Muslim nation has in recent years become increasingly conservative and more fundamental forms of Islam have gathered influence.

Under the country’s laws, pre-marital sex is a a crime and those found guilty are often flogged. In September 2012, a court ordered the public flogging of a 16-year-old woman who had confessed to premarital sex, while in the summer of 2009 a pregnant 18-year-old woman received 100 lashes in public after she admitted to having sex with two different men.

According to the Minivan news, the teenager involved in the latest case was sentenced following a police investigation that found she had been repeatedly raped by her stepfather.  In the summer of 2012, the teenager gave birth to the step-father’s baby, which he allegedly killed and buried beneath an outdoor shower area in their home.

During questioning by the police, the teenager reportedly confessed to having had consensual sex with another male. It is unclear whether this individual has been identified, traced or charged. Meanwhile, the teenager’s stepfather faces up to 25 years in jail if he is convicted of rape and murder.

A spokesman for President Mohamed Waheed, Masood Imad, told AFP that the teenager should be treated as a victim rather than a perpetrator of a crime. However, he added: “She is not going to be lashed to cause her pain... rather, it is for her to feel the shame for having engaged in activity forbidden by the religion.”

Friday, January 11, 2013

Toronto School Board gives Chris Spence $160,000 golden parachute for serial plagiarism

Photo from TDSB FaceBook page,
he noted, being careful to attribute something for once

Now that it’s been discovered that school board director Chris Spence has been plagiarizing for years – starting with his doctoral thesis if not earlier – he’s had to resign. Chris Bolton, chair of the Toronto District School Board has accepted Spence’s resignation with “a profoundly heavy heart.” And, says Bolton, in resigning, Spence did the honorable thing.

Not quite.

The honorable thing would have been to fess up to all his plagiarizing, which Spence hasn’t done. Even more, the honorable thing would have been to slink off, feeling deeply ashamed. Instead, he’s slinking off with $160,000 of our money.  That’s seven month’s salary, which apparently is what the school board pays for plagiarism these days.

Ah, but surely Spence is entitled to severance pay, you might say. Maybe legally. But not if he wants to be called honorable. After all, you don’t get severance when you get fired with cause, and while it’s nice of the Board to let him resign (which is why he gets severance), if he hadn’t gone peacefully, the Board surely would have terminated him.

The school board would never have even hired Spence if they’d known about his history of plagiarism. Indeed, even OISE wouldn’t have given him a PhD if they’d known about his plagiarism (though admittedly with OISE, anything’s possible), and without his PhD, Spence wouldn’t have been considered for the job of director.

So essentially, Spence got his job through fraud. Is he offering to return the money we’ve paid him? That would be the honorable thing.

I’m not really out for blood. I don’t really mind that Spence hasn’t owned up to all his plagiarism. His public shaming is complete. I don’t need to see him further humbled. Nor do I really expect him to pay back the salary he’s received over the years.

But it’s idiotic to say Spence did the honorable thing in accepting a $160,000 golden parachute.
Not that I blame Spence for accepting the payout. He’s got bills the same as everyone else. But the Board is at fault for offering Spence a severance package. This is what the Board still doesn’t get:  our schools need money! They’re falling apart. And you know, $160 grand here, a $160 grand there, and pretty soon you’re talking about real money.

Thanks to Anonymous for pointing out that Spence's severance package actually comes to about $200,000! Also, as usual, Robert K has good commentary over at Eye on a Crazy Planet.

Teachers' Union closes down the province's elementary schools without even going on strike

"No, we're not going to have an illegal walkout.
We can close the schools without one.
Until 4 a.m. this morning, the elementary teacher’s union was determined to stage a one-day walkout come hell or high water. A ruling by the Labour Board? To hell with it. A plea from the premier? To hell with him. Cries of panic from parents who didn’t know what to do with their kids? To hell with them.

Then the actual ruling came down: A walkout would indeed be an illegal strike. Immediately, the teachers’ union said they’d comply. And why not? They’d already caused maximum disruption.

Most school boards throughout the province had already said schools would be closed Friday. Most boards reversed that decision some time early this morning, but that was far too late.

I’m an early riser and a news junky. So I was one of the few parents in Toronto who heard there would be school today after all. But when my child and I arrived (about 15 minutes late), the school was a like a ghost town: empty classrooms everywhere. 

But all the teachers were in.

How did that happen? Did the teachers know all along that if the Labour Board ruled against them – which was always likely – that their union planned to back down?

At any rate, while all the teachers knew there was school today, almost no parents did. There were four kids in my child’s class.

So mission accomplished: schools throughout the province were shut down. But by doing it the sneaky way, unions have avoided a $2,000 fine for each teacher involved in an illegal strike and a $25,000 fine against the union. Good for them. Bad for parents.

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Hamas, PA reportedly refuse to take in Palestinian refugees from Syria


Gaza leader says the precedent might be used by Jerusalem to counter Palestinians’ demand for the ‘right of return’ to land within Israel


Syrians walking past destroyed vehicles after fighting between rebels and
Syrian troops in the Yarmouk camp for Palestinian refugees
in south Damascus, Syria, in 2012. (photo credit: AP)
Hamas and the Palestinian Authority rejected the United Nations’ request that they take in Palestinian refugees who fled Syria during the ongoing brutal civil war, Yedioth Ahronoth reported Thursday.

Finding themselves increasingly isolated, some 150,000 Palestinian refugees in Syria — there are approximately 350,000 in total in the country — were forced to flee the Yarmouk refugee camp located outside Damascus due to attacks, including an aerial bombardment, by the Bashar Assad regime. Their flight has created a humanitarian crisis in Damascus; others have fled to Lebanon and Jordan, reportedly causing those countries to become increasingly hostile to their presence there.

According to the report, head of Hamas in Gaza Ismail Haniyeh told UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, that the Gaza Strip couldn’t take in Syria’s Palestinian refugees due to an ideological issue: If they take in the refugees from Syria, Israel could use it against them when it comes to the Palestinians’ demand for the “right to return” to villages inside present day Israel, by pointing out that the refugees no longer need to return to Israel because they have been relocated to new homes in the Gaza Strip.

The Palestinian Authority’s refusal stems from a different reason — a financial one. The PA, which, according to the report, initially inquired about absorbing the Palestinian refugees in Syria, has experienced severe budget cuts and has begged Arab leaders for millions of dollars in loans to solve its debt crisis.

The PA’s own coffers have been hurt following Israel’s decision to withhold PA tax revenues and to use them to pay down a portion of the millions of dollars the PA owes Israel for electricity and other services.

Sunday, January 6, 2013

The end of the peace process

President Abbas of the Palestinian Authority accepts framed map that
shows Palestine extending from the Jordan River to
the Mediterranean Sea, with Israel erased. More here.

A recent poll by a Palestinian research firm found that 88% of Palestinians favour violence as the way forward in their conflict with Israel (see here). This should surprise no one. The Palestinians can win make believe victories at the UN, but on the ground, the diplomatic route is futile, since Israel cannot give what the Palestinians want.

The last time anything happened in the peace process was in 2008 when then Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert offered the Palestinians a comprehensive peace settlement. The offer included a Palestinian capital in Jerusalem and international control over the holy sites.

Territorially, Olmert offered the equivalent of 100% of the West Bank and Gaza, with a corridor connecting them in exchange for the slivers of land occupied by Israeli settlements.

Abbas said no thanks and he made no counter offer.

Why? Because the Palestinians aren’t willing to concede the Jewish claim to their own homeland in Israel. Hamas makes no secret of its desire to wipe Israel off the map. More “moderate” Palestinians insist on the “right of return.” That is, they claim that the four million grandchildren of refugees originally created by Arab wars against Israel should be allowed to move into Israel and thereby turn it into a Palestinian state.

Obviously peace requires the Palestinians to give up on this idea of eliminating Israel, and in 2008, peaceniks all threw up our hands in frustration at Abbas’s stubbornness.

In retrospect, we should breathe a sigh of relief. For it’s evident the Palestinians wouldn’t have kept the peace, and since the UN voted to give the Palestinians standing as a non-member state, it’s now clear that when the Palestinians break a treaty, the world supports them.

Indeed is there any part of their interim treaty with Israel that the Palestinians have kept?

The Oslo Accords state that neither side can unilaterally try to change the status quo, that the Palestinians cannot, for example, apply to the UN to be recognized as a state. But the Palestinian did just that, and the UN overwhelmingly supported them.

The Oslo Accords require the Palestinians to forego violence, yet since they were signed, the Palestinians have conducted thousands of terrorist attacks against Israel that have resulted in three wars: the Second Intifadah and the Hamas wars of Dec 2008 / Jan 2009 and of November 2012.

The Oslo Accords forbid incitement. But terrorists are the great heroes of Palestinian society. Schools, summer camps, soccer teams and public squares get named in honour of terrorists.

Two days after winning their historic vote for statehood at the UN, the official Palestinian Authority radio station, broadcast songs glorifying suicide bombings against Israel. They included these lyrics: 
We are bombs... the enemies were beheaded... Grieve not, Mother, shed no tears over my torn flesh... heroic men who mock death... We praised the Lord, and set out for Martyrdom. We strapped ourselves with explosives, and trusted in Allah... Onward men, on the roads to glory.
Is there any wonder Palestinians are so enamoured of violence? It’s actively promoted from the top down and from the bottom up.

The Oslo Accords state that parties who pursue their aims through unlawful means (such as terrorism) or that are racist cannot run in Palestinian elections. The clause was included specifically to exclude Hamas, which has launched thousands of terrorist attacks against Israel and openly proclaims its desire to kill Jews.

Canada, Japan, the U.S., Israel, and the European Union have all declared Hamas a terrorist group. Even the UN has declared it a racist organization. (More here.) Yet the international community didn’t object when Hamas ran in the 2006 Palestinian elections.

Strangely, it didn’t occur to people that democracy can’t thrive where political parties have private armies. In retrospect it should have surprised no one that the Palestinian elections were followed by a short, sharp civil war that left the West Bank ruled by the Palestinian Authority dominated by Fatah and Gaza ruled by Hamas.

Because the Oslo Accords were ignored, Israel now has a terrorist enclave sitting on its eastern border. Moreover, even supposing it wanted to, since the Palestinian Authority no longer controls Gaza, it cannot end the conflict with Israel.

As the Palestinians cannot implement a peace treaty, don’t keep their treaties, and receive the world’s support when they break a treaty, we need to recognize that the peace process is dead and that it’s time for the peace movement to change direction.

The obstacle to peace is the Palestinian “narrative.” Israel has long recognized the Palestinian right to a state of their own, but no Palestinian political party recognizes the right of the Jews to their own state.

Instead, the Palestinians – including supposed moderates – claim all of Israel as rightfully theirs, deny any Jewish connection to the land, and paint Israel as an evil entity that ought to be wiped off the map.

In addressing the UN on the historic occasion of the vote for Palestinian non-member status, President Abbas accused Israel of racism, apartheid, colonialism, aggression, murder and ethnic cleansing.

So long as this remains the Palestinian narrative, peace will remain a fantasy, no matter what pieces of paper might be signed.

This piece also appeared on Harry's Place blog in Britain, and because the comments at Harry's Place get deleted after a week, I've preserved them here:



  • Beakerkin  2 days ago

    The elimination of Israel has been the goal since the start of the wars and remained the goal.

    • Avatar

      Reborn  2 days ago

      A poll in the UK would probably show that 90% of the supporters of the "Palestinian cause" believe in violence against Israel.
      A substantial minority would advocate violence against Jews anywhere..
      It is only terrorism against Western interests that keep this wretched issue alive. The atrocities committed by islamists from Mali to the Caucasus are ignored because, thus far, the terrorists do not have sympathetic advocates from our pointless & value free "left".

      • Avatar

        Dcook  Reborn  2 days ago

        As an aside, keep a watch on Morsi going to see Obama. He's still insisting that he wants the Blind Sheikh (responsible for the WTC bombing) released, or as a minimum to have special privelieges. Watch how swiftly (or not) Obama flips him the bird.

    • Avatar

      Colin  2 days ago

      I'll guess that the chances of Palestinians voting for peace with Jews are as much as Sunnis voting for peace with Shias, or by extension with any group of humans that don't belong, apart from say a tribe of DAs.

      • Avatar

        Dcook  2 days ago

        At last! An ATL commenter who understands the peace process is dead and its the fault of the Palestinians.
        Never has Golda Meir's saying "The Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity" been so well defined and seen to be classically true.
        Showing a map where you have erased another country is covered by the conventions on Genocide as one of the elements that defines Genocide intentions.
        How can the lie that "the Palestinians recognise Israel" when it is clear that they do not?

        • Avatar

          Beakerkin  Dcook  2 days ago

          Obviously if you believe in the Obama cult this is a mistake. The messiah can convince people who have never been inclined towards peace to accept peace by blaming Israel.
          Obviously Israelis who don't trust Obama need to read Gene and Goldberg and join the cult.

          • Avatar

            Makabit  Beakerkin  2 days ago

            Yes, I remember when Obamessiah sent Condi Rice to scold Israel about the settlements, and how they weren't helpful to the peace process. My blood near boiled.
            Wait...

            • Avatar

              vildechaye  Makabit  2 days ago

              nice one, makabit.

              • Avatar

                stephen rothbart  vildechaye  2 days ago

                Yes Vildechaye, you would rather make a comment about someone's mistake than the catastrophe facing Israel and nation and people you profess to support.
                That Bush did silly things is not in question, but in case you and makabit have not noticed, Bush is not in the White House now, your man Obama is.
                And despite an extensive and alarming post about the treacherous nature of the international community's attitude to Israel and their unbelievably vile support of everything Palestinian, the only thing you can offer is a smirking giggle on a "gotcha" remark by Makabit.
                At at time when the Palestinians are reviewing maps of Palestine without a Jewish presence, and Obama has just nominated Hagel and Kerry for the roles directly affecting Israel's ability to survive the world's community's persecution of the Jewish state, you can only put your hands over your ears, shut your eyes and go la la la.
                Well good for you and your hollow victory over Bearkin.

                • Avatar

                  vildechaye  stephen rothbart  2 days ago

                  I'll take it. Meanwhile, you can take your "my way or the highway" approach to all things Israel/U.S. and shove it up your peahole.

                • Avatar

                  Beakerkin  stephen rothbart  2 days ago

                  There is no victory. The cult of Obama has not accomplished anything. Even the death of Bin Laden was in spite of Obama, not because of his leadership.

                • Avatar

                  Makabit  stephen rothbart  2 days ago

                  It's not, actually, a gotcha. It's a comment that the criticism of Obama on this issue has been incredibly shallow, and informed by a strong, pre-existing dislike of the man among many of his critics.
                  There is a lot to criticize about Obama's approach to Israel, just as there was about Bush, and a whole long line of presidents before him. But many people don't offer criticism, they offer paranoid explanations of malevolent intent. These same people find things that Bush did, who they consider Israel's bestest friend (as Beakerkin clearly still does), to be premeditated attacks on Israel when Obama does them. I'm not trying to attack Bush, either. He tried, to the extent that he had time and interest, to do the right thing in regards to Israel, and I think he had a certain hope for the peace process. Somehow he got a different reaction from a certain crowd.
                  This does not make me take the folks talking nonsense like this very seriously.

                  • Avatar

                    vildechaye  Makabit  a day ago

                    Bingo. Of course, you'll still be accused of being an Obama-worshipper by the local ODS crowd.

                    • Avatar

                      stephen rothbart  vildechaye  20 hours ago

                      Well of course if you both like the kind of man who tells the Russians, sotto voce, that they just need to wait until after the election and then things will change, then that is up to you.
                      And if you like the kind of man that appoints a Right wing homophobic anti-Semite as Defense Secretary then that is of course up to you too.
                      I don't like Obama, it's true, but he is President of the United States. And he has just appointed a man both sides dislike as his Defense Secretary, and this is about Israel and her safety, so if you cannot find anything to worry about there, then perhaps it's you who both have the ODS in the sense that you are both so smitten with him that you will never see the things he is doing and saying in a realistic light.

              • Avatar

                Beakerkin  Makabit  2 days ago

                Actually, nobody accused GW of ever wavering on Israel. GW was Pro-Israel and did not waste his time with intransigent Arabs.
                The Cult of Obama says the Israelis should sell their security for the glory of the Cult. The Arabs do not want peace.

            • Avatar

              cba  Dcook  2 days ago

              Just a couple of pedantic points (sorry): It was Abba Eban who (more or less) said that, not Golda Meir, and what he actually said was, "The Arabs never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity." He said it in the days before "Palestinian" referred exclusively to the Arab inhabitants of the area. (As you know, prior to Israel's establishment, a "Palestinian" was a Jew who lived in the area.)
              Apart from that, I agree with your comment.

            • Avatar

              Biscuit Barrel  2 days ago

              I have absolutely zero sympathy for the Palestinian cause. None whatsoever. I only have sympathy for the ordinary Palestinians - represented by scum at home and advocated for by scum abroad.

              • Avatar

                Lynne T  Biscuit Barrel  2 days ago

                It never ceases to amaze me how blind most people are to the manipulation that has gone on around the displacement of Palestinians from 20% of Mandatory Palestine over 60 years ago. It's made very outrageously rich men out of scum like Arafat and Abbas and provide employment of various kinds, from creepy "activitsts" to outright bands of thugs who intimidate their opposition into silence or compliance. And I fear that there are elements in the aboriginal community here in Canada who have learned from the Palestinian "resistance". We have at the moment, the chief of a small band in Northern Ontario and some supporters on a hunger strike holding out for meetings with our PM and Governor General on a broader rights issue, while, at the same time she and her spokespeople are is refusing to make any statements about $80 million in funds provided to the band for which the band council has been unable to furnish the independent auditors sent in by the government of Canada with any documentation as where monies meant to alleviate the terrible housing situation on that reserve has gone. I'm sure there are people back in Attawapaskat who know but are likely unable to speak out for fear of reprisals, but little is being mentioned about this in the Canadian media. Instead the focus is on the sideshow that's grown up around the hunger strike under the brand "Idle No More".

                • Avatar

                  vildechaye  Lynne T  a day ago

                  Yes Lynne, I find the tactics and demands of the chiefs and the movement to be quite repulsive; and the cowtowing to their demands (e.g. not good enough to see the PM, the GG must attend too," etc etc) even more revolting.

                  • Avatar

                    Lynne T  vildechaye  18 hours ago

                    Terry Malewski, one of the CBC's few good reporters had two things to say about Theresa Spense and her entourage -- that Spense has no idea how to get things done in the modern world and that her PR team are quite incapable of communicating on her behalf.

              • Avatar

                Hunt S Cross  2 days ago

                100% factual and logical.

                • Avatar

                  Colin  2 days ago

                  How recent is the photograph? What's the occasion? Who's in the photo with Abbas?.

                  • Avatar

                    Fasdunkle  Colin  2 days ago

                    the speech abbas read at the UN recently was printed on headed paper showing a map of "Palestine" - no Israel.

                    • Avatar

                      TorontoBobby  Colin  2 days ago

                      Colin,
                      The photo is from a Palestinian Youth Conference in
                      Ramallah, April 27, 2009. According to Palestinian Media Watch, the photo was published in both official PA newspapers. I chose this photo because it was made for publication and shows up nicely, but as Fasdunkle notes, the PA erases Israel from the map as a matter of course.
                      By the way, Abbas told the conference delegates: “A Jewish State, what is that supposed to mean? You can call yourselves as you like, but I don’t accept it
                      and I say so publically. All I know is that there is the State of Israel, in the borders of 1967, not one centimeter less. Anything else I don’t accept.” (http://www.palwatch.org/main.a...
                      You might say it’s good that Abbas does accept Israel within “the borders of 1967” (meaning the Armistice line of 1948). But his rejection of Israel as a Jewish state is a rejection of Israel’s legitimacy. And along
                      with Abbas’s “acceptance” of Israel comes the notion that it’s really all Palestine and the hope that sometime soon it will all be Palestinian once
                      again.

                      • Avatar

                        stephen rothbart  TorontoBobby  2 days ago

                        So we go round and round in circles. The world tries to push Israel into a two state solution which the Arabs will not accept because they do not accept the concept of Israel.
                        So the world punishes Israel for not trying harder.
                        After Alamein, Churchill remarked that the victory was "not the end. It is not even the
                        beginning of the end. but it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning."
                        With the Peace process, I doubt very much there was even a start of the beginning. And it is indeed the end.

                      • Avatar

                        Colin  TorontoBobby  a day ago

                        How strange of Abbas to allow himself to be photographed displaying a Hamas wish-map. If that - and not the 1967 borders - is his bargaining position, he might as resign and hand over to Hamas whose retrospective claim is for a good chunk of Turkish empire from 'the river to the sea'.

                    • Avatar

                      Sebastapol  2 days ago

                      "88 percent believe that the results of the confrontation in Gaza prove that armed struggle is the best means of achieving Palestinian independence."
                      Not really that surprising - it's difficult to see what other message would be taken from Pillar of Defence.
                      There was no ground invasion. There was a relaxation of the blockade. Tel Aviv was proven to be in range. Egypt continued to emerge as the natural political backer of Hamas.
                      This wasn't a bad war for them, especially compared to the disaster of Cast Lead.
                      Meanwhile, literally hours after having granted those concessions to a militant Gaza, 50 arrests made in the West Bank.

                      • Avatar

                        Kellie Strøm  2 days ago

                        Brian writes: "The Oslo Accords state that parties who pursue their aims through unlawful means (such as terrorism) or that are racist cannot run in Palestinian elections."
                        I'm having trouble finding this clause in either Oslo 1 or Oslo 2. Can anyone give chapter and verse?

                      • Avatar

                        James Mendelsohn  2 days ago

                        Great piece.
                        Question: can anyone please point me to an accurate online account of what was offered at Annapolis?

                        • Avatar

                          Lamia  2 days ago

                          An excellent piece, Bryan.
                          Neither the Palestinian populace nor their supporters want peace, they want total victory and the Jews completely under a Muslim heel once more.
                          So they don't really deserve sympathy. And there are far worse and actually real humanitarian problems in the world than in the supposed open-air concentration camp which in fact has a higher life expectancy than any other Arab population.

                          • Avatar

                            Lynne T  Lamia  2 days ago

                            Substantially higher. And by the same token, while the Palestinians are not immediately resposible for the vile treatment of Jews in other parts of the MENA, they are very prompt to deny or excuse treatment that dwarfs anything they experienced at Zionist hands in their name.

                          • Avatar

                            Fasdunkle  2 days ago

                            This is an interesting view - Israel's Jihad is Mine

                            • Avatar

                              vildechaye  Fasdunkle  2 days ago

                              Excellent article by a Muslim woman whose intelligence is surpassed only by her bravery.

                              • Avatar

                                stephen rothbart  Fasdunkle  2 days ago

                                Yes fantastic. It would be good to know if her article appeared in any western mainstream media outlets or just in Israel.
                                Or is it just hidden away so as not to put the politicians and Trade Unions to shame for endorsing such a heinous body of murderers.
                                This woman embodies what I used to think about Islam before it was highjacked by intolerant racists, and groups like the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama's new best friends.

                                • Avatar

                                  vildechaye  stephen rothbart  a day ago

                                  Always got to throw in a mention of Obama, don't you. See what I mean about ODS.... As for peahole, I don't know what it means, but it felt like the right thing to say at the time. Funny thing is, in spite of your obsessions and hysterics, i like you rothbart.

                                  • Avatar

                                    stephen rothbart  vildechaye  19 hours ago

                                    Well with friends etc. etc... but you know we are not so far apart in our views as you think, only with regards Obama.
                                    Look, I am not comparing the man to a Hitler or a Stalin, I do not think he is evil. If he is anti-Israel that is his choice. Lots of people are, in fact I don't think he hates Israel as such, just thinks he knows better than they do how to run their country and in trying to push them into his way of the thinking is completely undermining her.
                                    Yes, I think he is a unscrupulous politician and severely under qualified to be President of the United States, but so are many of the politicians on both sides of the political divide.
                                    But like we had with Tony Blair, who was involved in a great deal of dubious, bordering on criminal actions for which he was never held to account by the adoring Press because he was a personable good-looking guy, I feel Obama gets a free ride for similar reasons, and he has been involved a lot of dubious actions even in his first four years.
                                    I hold just two opinions on his policies and I felt them before the election: that is he is a "Clear and Present Danger" to the fortunes of Israel and second he is a "Clear and Present Danger" to the US economy.
                                    So as both these events affect me and my life I feel the need to do what the MSM refuses to do, which is to constantly draw attention to certain things he does as often as I can.
                                    And I did not invent the endorsement of the MB by the White House. It has been reported in many of the publications and by Arab commentators warning against it, as much as by right wing publications.
                                    I think it is important to put Obama's actions in their proper context, not because I don't like him much, but because he is the President of the United States, once one of the most influential nations in the Free World, but fast losing that status. And that's it.

                              • Avatar

                                Commentary101  2 days ago

                                Great piece!
                                And, joining the other commentators with the same spirit, I must say that the discussion in Israel, presently, revolves around one key fault of Oslo: The import, for sake of governance, into the WB, of a ragtag band of murders -- the PLO.
                                (It is worth noting, I think, that by 1991, Arafat, with his uncompromising support for S. Hussein, had become one of the most hated -- and marginalised -- figures in the Arab world. 
                                He had established, with remnants of the PFLP, a sanctuary in Tunisia; whence he was inserted into the West Bank... And the rest, as they say, is History).
                                .
                                The idea, that an organisation whose raison d'etre has always been Israel's elimination could conceivably reform into a democratic, civil prototype of a future state, is as absurd now, as it was all those years ago(Oslo's 20th anniversary is coming up).
                                Here, I fear, Israel is at least partly to blame. It preferred the easier option, of placating the extremists and the most vociferous of agents, instead of trying to cultivate however slowly, patiently, abidingly, Democratic Palestinian self-government from the grassroots level.
                                I am afraid that Oslo's shadow now casts itself as Israelis referring to Abbas & Co., affectionately, as the "Killers of Tunis" -- they're not mistaken in that characterisation.

                                • Avatar

                                  Lee Ratner  Commentary101  a day ago

                                  The best time to have finally settled the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was about the time of the Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty. Begin had some plans to set up an autonomous government in Gaza and the West Bank and for that to be included in the treaty. It got left out because the Palestinians wanted no part of it, partly because of their non-recognition strategy and partly because Begin's plans did not give the autonomous government a lot of power.
                                  If the Palestinians took up Begin's offer, the Palestinians could have learned how to govern themselves and live peacefully in Israel. Since it would have been part of a wider Israel-Arab peace plan, there would be more pressure to keep in good faith, probably. Within a decade, Palestine might have been a state.

                                  • Avatar

                                    Commentary101  Lee Ratner  a day ago

                                    Excellent points, thanks.
                                    The mainspring of my argument, was that Arafat shouldn't have been admitted into the WB & Gaza.
                                    Thereafter, we got terrorism, and the festering problem we've got, today.

                                • Avatar

                                  Sarka  2 days ago

                                  Excellent article. The question is, where does Israel go from here?

                                  • Avatar

                                    Petra Marquardt-Bigman  Sarka  2 days ago

                                    Not that I have a serious answer, but unseriously, I'm tempted to say: Hah! We are going nowhere! We are staying put! The Palestinians proudly call it "sumud", steadfastness, and all the world admires them for it -- but yes, we can do it too: Netanyahu the Palestinian:http://www.project-syndicate.o...

                                    • Avatar

                                      Sarka  Petra Marquardt-Bigman  a day ago

                                      Interesting and persuasive link, thank you.
                                      Though it's rather tangential here, I'm coming to the conclusion that behind much blindly anti-Israeli feeling in the West there is, apart from the usual conscious or more often unconscious antisemitic elements - an effort to preserve illusions about human nature.
                                      Seeing the IP situation for what it is means facing the ugly truth about Palestinian, and more broadly Arab eliminationist, even genocidal, attitudes to Israel/Jews. This is just too painful and demoralising for many people, especially on the left which typically has greater investment in belief in the goodness of human nature, and so in this case cannot entertain the truth because just formulating it seems like committing the sin of racism. And perversely, it is through the logic of evasion that they get mired in an antisemitism.that some of them disingenuously, but others sincerely, deny.
                                      Of course it is not racism: we are talking cultural and political attitudes and mentalities here, not biology; nobody suggests that all Palestinians/Arabs are equally, uniformly eliminationist - only that such attitudes are deep-seated and quite characteristic, and are a major driver of behaviour and - to put it mildly - circumscribe the possibilities of negotiation.
                                      The trouble is, that the much extended concepts of racism now popular on the lib/left - including any unflattering views of culture, characteristic (if not uniform) attitudes and of course religion, in addition to their other problematic aspects, do genuinely disable realistic understanding of IP.

                                      • Avatar

                                        NicoleS  Sarka  a day ago

                                        Spot on again, Sarka. It's the old story of left wing people wanting to feel good about themselves. Fine, until that becomes the most important consideration.

                                        • Avatar

                                          Lee Ratner  Sarka  a day ago

                                          I think that a lot of liberals do recognize that there lots of bad parts of Arab/Muslim culture. I think they are reluctant to openly criticize it because they think it'll only make the problem worse; cause the Arab/Muslim societies to go further into their shells. They also think that there isn't anything that could be realistically done to bring about change from the outside. Arabs and Muslims are going to have liberalize themselves and this is going to take awhile.

                                        • Avatar

                                          NicoleS  Petra Marquardt-Bigman  a day ago

                                          Thanks for a fascinating link, Petra. Do you think Netanyahu is becoming more popular at home, if not abroad?

                                        • Avatar

                                          Lee Ratner  Sarka  a day ago

                                          At this point, I'm favoring some sort of unilateral withdrawal and containment from the WB. Israel should just leave the WB as much as possible and say its a free state. Allow the Palestinians to form relations with any power they want even Iran. At the same time the security barrier should be maintained.

                                          • Avatar

                                            Sarka  Lee Ratner  a day ago

                                            It's an understandable point of view, but the example of the unilateral withdrawal from Gaza is not encouraging. , with the security risks to Israel even greater in the very likely event of things going wrong.

                                      • Avatar

                                        Fasdunkle  2 days ago

                                        Abbas remembers some dodgy folk

                                        • Avatar

                                          Carl Williams  a day ago

                                          Excellent stuff, well done Sir.

                                        .