Sreenivasan Jain of NDTV reports on Hamas rocket fired from next to his hotel |
Hamas
manipulated and intimidated the media in Gaza. Why was that kept from us?
by Alan Johnson in The Telegraph
Alan
Johnson is the Editor of Fathom: for a deeper understanding of Israel
and the region and Senior Research Fellow at the Britain Israel Communications
and Research Centre (BICOM). A professor of democratic theory and practice, he
is an editorial board member of Dissent magazine, and a Senior Research
Associate at The Foreign Policy Centre.
We should
normally say if our reports are censored or monitored or if we withhold
information, and explain, wherever possible, the rules under which we are
operating. – Section 11.4.1 of the BBC Editorial Guidelines on
accuracy and impartiality in times of War, Terror and Emergencies
The Foreign Press Association (FPA)
issued an astonishing protest yesterday about "blatant, incessant,
forceful and unorthodox" intimidation of journalists in the Gaza Strip by
Hamas. "In several cases," they complained, "foreign
reporters working in Gaza have been harassed, threatened or questioned over
stories."
The FPA said this amounted to
"denying readers and viewers an objective picture from the ground,"
adding "we are also aware that Hamas is trying to put in
place a 'vetting' procedure that would, in effect, allow for the blacklisting
of specific journalists. Such a procedure is vehemently opposed by the FPA." The
statement raises a lot of questions. Here is one: why have British broadcasters
not mentioned any of this to their viewers?
Let's review what we know.
Indian television station NDTV
broadcast and posted on its internet site on 5 August a report by Sreenivasan Jain showing
rockets fired from a tent next to his hotel. In the accompanying text on NDTV’s
website, Jain wrote that it was published "after our team left the Gaza
Strip – Hamas has not taken very kindly to any reporting of its rockets being
fired. But just as we reported the devastating consequences of Israel’s
offensive on Gaza’s civilians, it is equally important to report on how Hamas
places those very civilians at risk by firing rockets deep from the heart of
civilian zones."
In an article published subsequently, Jain
wrote of "the fear which hobbles the reporting such material: fear of
reprisals from Hamas against us", asking "how long do we self-censor
because of the fear of personal safety in return for not telling a story that
exposes how those launching rockets are putting so many more lives at risk,
while the rocket-makers themselves are at a safe distance?"
Hamas spokesman being interviewed at Al Shifa Hospital, which doubles as Hamas's military command centre |
More and more examples of
intimidation of journalists by Hamas are seeping out of Gaza:
·
Israeli filmmaker Michael Grynszpan described on Facebook an exchange he had
had with a Spanish journalist who had just left Gaza. "We talked about the
situation there. He was very friendly. I asked him how come we never see on
television channels reporting from Gaza any Hamas people, no gunmen, no rocket launcher,
no policemen. We only see civilians on these reports, mostly women and
children. He answered me frankly: 'It's very simple, we did see Hamas people
there launching rockets, they were close to our hotel, but if ever we dare
pointing our camera on them they would simply shoot at us and kill us.'"
·
An op-ed in The Australian and
other sources including The Jerusalem Post noted that after Nine Network reporter
Peter Stefanovic tweeted that he had seen rockets fired into Israel from near
his hotel, he was threatened by pro-Hamas tweeters and warned: "in WWII
spies got shot".
·
The Wall Street Journal's Nick Casey posted a photo of a Hamas spokesman being interviewed
from a room in the hospital along with this tweet: "You have to wonder
(with) the shelling how patients at Shifa hospital feel as Hamas uses it as a
safe place to see media." After "a flood of online threats", the
tweet was deleted.
·
John Reed of The Financial
Times was reportedly threatened after he tweeted about rockets being
fired from the same hospital.
·
Following his departure from Gaza, Italian
journalist Gabriele Barbati tweeted on 29 July. "Out of #Gaza
far from #Hamas retaliation: misfired rocket killed children yday in Shati.
Witness: militants rushed and cleared debris."
·
French-Palestinian journalist Radjaa
Abou Dagga wrote anarticle for French newspaper Libération, on
July 23, detailing how he was "detained and interrogated by members of
Hamas's al-Qassam Brigade at a room in Shifa hospital next to the emergency
room" and was forced to leave Gaza immediately without his papers. The day
after publication, Mr Dagga asked Libération to remove his article from their website.
·
RT correspondent Harry Fear was told to leave Gaza after he tweeted that
Hamas fired rockets into Israel from near his hotel.
Hamas manipulation of the media is
not always so crude.
·
As reported in Times of Israel on 11 July, the Hamas Ministry
of Interior in Gaza published a video in Arabic advising on
"cautious and effective" social media engagement on Facebook and
Twitter during Operation Protective Edge. It contained such directives as
"Anyone killed or martyred is to be called a civilian from Gaza or
Palestine, before we talk about his status in jihad or his military rank …
Don't forget to always add 'innocent civilian' or 'innocent citizen' in your
description of those killed in Israeli attacks on Gaza."
·
Hamas has also actively interfered
with bomb sites in order to gain PR advantage. The Washington Post's Sudarsan
Raghavan detailed how Hamas staged events and
scenes to evoke sympathy. By way of illustration, he was taken to photograph a
mosque that had been bombed, and discovered that someone had
"prepared" the scene and placed a prayer mat and burnt Quran pages.
"The symbolism was obvious, almost too perfect. It was clear that someone
had placed them there to attract sympathy for the Palestinian cause. A
television crew spotted the pile and filmed it. Mission accomplished."
·
Hamas ensure reporters are exposed to
casualties by insisting that spokesmen could only be interviewed in the
courtyard of the Al-Shifa hospital, as described by Ynet News.
The long Hamas record of shutting down news bureaus, arresting reporters
and cameramen, confiscating equipment and beating journalists has already
been documented by
the Committee
to Protect Journalists. In the latest conflict Hamas wanted to
reduce the reports coming out of Gaza to what Reinhold Niebuhr once
called "emotionally potent over-simplifications". Journalists from
India, America, Norway, Italy, Spain, Australia, Canada and elsewhere are
complaining. Will we now hear from the Brits?
P.S. Check out this broadcast from Lebanon in which a Hamas spokesperson expresses Hamas's annoyance with journalists who were "fixated on the notion of peace." The spokesperson explains Hamas's policy of having "a chat" with journalists who don't follow Hamas's narrative and how they deported journalists who filmed where Hamas fired their rockets; e.g., from school yards, hospitals and hotel parking lots.
No comments:
Post a Comment