Here’s how
it all happened.
Last week: Richard Falk – whom we got expelled from the group Human Rights
Watch in December (see letter here), but still serves on the tyrant-controlled UN Human Rights
Council – published an article pinning the blame for the Boston bombings
on “the American global domination project.”
It got
worse: “[A]s long as Tel Aviv has the compliant ear of the American
political establishment,” wrote Falk, “those who wish
for peace and justice in the world should not rest easy.”
Here was a
top UN official telling Boston’s victims that they got what they deserved, and
that America and Israel were to blame. Yet the United Nations was silent.
Its Human Rights Council was silent. Its High Commissioner for Human Rights,
Ms. Navi Pillay, was silent. Falk's academic colleagues were silent. The world
was silent.
Monday: UN Watch broke the silence. In a
detailed letter to UN chief Ban Ki-moon and U.S.
Ambassador Susan Rice, we exposed Falk’s despicable remarks; identified its
ignominious messages; and demanded action.
UN Watch
circulated the story to thousands of journalists worldwide, launched a barrage
of press releases, statements, and blog posts, and posted the facts on Twitter,
Facebook and YouTube.
This was the
immediate response of Ban Ki-moon’s spokesman: “The
Secretary-General did not appoint him and is not responsible for his
views.” The UN was refusing to act. No one would take
responsibility.
Tuesday: UN Watch
ramped up the campaign. We slammed Mr. Ban’s silence, noting the UN chief had
condemned an unheard-of figure in the US who insulted Islam, but refused to do
the same when a major figure of his own organization insulted America.
Reporters at
the UN pressed for comment. Again, Ban Ki-moon’s spokesman refused,
saying,“Richard Falk speaks independently... he is free to say what he
wants to say.” The UN was doubling down.
By now,
however, UN Watch’s campaign began bearing fruit. Stories appeared in Jewish
newspapers and blogs worldwide, in Canada’s National Post, Italy’s
ANSA news agency, and in a Wall Street Journal column
entitled “What the Falk?”
At 3:00
pm, the U.S. Mission publicly condemned Falk’s “provocative
and offensive” remarks, and the “absurdity” of
his service as a UN human rights expert. “Someone who spews such
vitriol has no place at the UN,” said Ambassador Rice,
in a Twitter post quickly endorsed by former Spanish Foreign Minister
Ana Palacio. The story spread further, reported by top news site Politico, Nederlands
Dagblad, the Kuwait News Agency, and many others.
Wednesday: Faced with mounting pressure, the United
Nations finally reversed course.At 12:07 pm, speaking at the daily press briefing, Ban Ki-moon’s
spokesman announced: “The
Secretary-General rejects Mr. Falk’s comments [which] “undermine the credibility
and the work of the United Nations.”
- Now the story went viral, with global
headlines from the Associated Press and Reuters: “U.N. chief
scolds envoy for implying U.S. policy sparked Boston attack.”
- The British Mission blasted
Falk’s “antisemitic” remarks, highlighting it was
the third time they had to do so.
- Canadian Foreign Minister John
Baird slammed
Falk’s “mean-spirited, anti-Semitic rhetoric” and
called for him to be kicked out of the UN. “The United Nations
should be ashamed to even be associated with such an individual,” he
added.
Falk’s
defenders, outraged at UN Watch, have now begun to rally, lashing out against
us in lengthy manifestos. “UN Watch crafts the smoking gun,” screams
a headline on Mondoweiss, a leading anti-Israel website. “UN Watch
Better Watch Itself,” warns the headline of an essay by Jeremy
Hammond, the publisher of Falk’s article.
Why are they
so angry?
Because
thanks to UN Watch pressure, their hero, the world body’s most vicious hater of
America, Israel, and Western democratic society, was exposed, denounced,
and shamed by world leaders—including by the head of the United Nations
himself. And rightfully so.